Home > Communication, Internal communication > You are who you hang out with

You are who you hang out with

Communication comes in two flavours: Communication and communication. Communication with big ‘C’ refers to the formal, planned communication programmes; the ‘big splash’, so to speak. By communication (small ‘c’) I am referring to the informal means of communicating with people: word of mouth, role models, mentoring, on the job training, one to one meetings etc. In organisations, we need both types of communication for communication to be powerful and most effective.

An interesting article in the New Scientist magazine, considers the transmission of communication through informal networks. Whilst this article puts an interesting slant on these ‘transmissions’ considering anything from moods (happiness, depression) to habit patterns and illnesses, what is interesting is the subconscious and rapid way that our peers influence our behaviour.

Recent research shows that our moods are far more strongly influenced by those around us than we tend to think. Not only that, we are also beholden to the moods of friends of friends, and of friends of friends of friends – people three degrees of separation away from us who we have never met, but whose disposition can pass through our social network like a virus. The fact that, seemingly, friends and peer groups are more influential than relatives or partners and spouses is even more pertinent to the transmission of communication at work. And gender is important, so the research claims: women observe and are influenced far more by other women and vice versa for men.

So what does this mean for organisational communication? There are two sides to this: the first that we need to recognise how powerful this transmission of ‘influence’ is in the organisation’s informal communication system. If employees are influenced more by those around them – in terms of attitudes, thoughts and behaviour – we need to know how to use this for positive influence in communication and change programmes. We also need to understand that this social influence can both hinder and help change communication programmes. And of course, what applies inside the organisation through informal social networks, applies even more powerfully outside the organisation. Think of the informal influence, negative or positive, that your salesmen, engineers and customer service staff have on your customers every day.

This influence is spread through a process of unconscious imitation – like the reflex action of our nervous system, this imitation by passes any conscious process and is performed highly efficiently by our brain and nervous system without any conscious interference or even awareness. Remember how infectious a smile is? I often walk around with a smile on my face, and I notice other people – complete strangers – smiling at me for no reason at all! I think they are nutters until i realise that they are simply and unconsciously copying me. This process of unconscious imitation – copying of behaviour – that we humans are so beautifully ‘wired up’ to do – facilitates in the ‘modeler’ (the person doing the copying) the experience of the emotion of the model. By copying that person’s smile with my body (facial expression, posture) i experience a ‘pale reflection’ of my model’s emotions. So by copying behaviours, I start to experience the attitudes, emotions and even thoughts of the person I am copying.

And what of the implication for organisational communications? By tapping into the ‘collective intelligence’ of social networks in the organisation we can ‘engineer’ the adoption and spread of new behaviour and cultural change. Viral Change (TM) offers a process for this, but it does require careful planning and facilitation (and an understanding of human behaviour) behind the scenes. Coupled with a strong ‘Communication’ programme, this can be a very powerful way to effect change and communication in organisations.

And what about applying this yourself? Whilst we might not be in complete conscious control of the process of social modelling, our brains take the shortcuts before we even know it; we can choose who we have around us who are likely to influence us. In 2009, do you want to be more happy or more depressed? More successful or more lazy? Whichever you prefer, think carefully about who you have around you – they might be more influential than you think!

Talk to us at Changeworks to find out how we use traditional and new media as well as behavioural change techniques to turn around performance and communication in organisations: info@changeworkscom.co.uk.

Share
  1. January 5th, 2009 at 00:49 | #1

    I posted the comments in quotes below in response to your comment on the New Scientist article. I then found your website via google and have posted my response again here.

    “I have just completed a masters dissertation which attempted to find what governs peoples decisions to genuinely and sustainably adopt innovations, specifically trainers use of e learning. My own thoughts are that social influences are greater than many think but I am left with the problem of how to alter or create social acceptance of a change in an organisational setting. I would be interested to find out more about your workplace research. Have you any records/examples of your work that can be made available?(the wiki link to Herrero’s Viral Change appears not to work)”

    I work in a UK police force which has a peculiar culture involving heirarchical structures but with strong usually unrecognised and informal networks which seem sto hold greater sway over real actions and decisions. I identified these as communities of practice as defined by Etienne Wenger. I wonder if Viral Change might be a way forward for me. My position is not a managerial one and I have recognised the need in the prevailing circumstances to adopt something of the stealth approach to change which you describe. i guess i am saying I cant pay or arrange payment for your consultancy but would like to know more about your methods!

  2. January 6th, 2009 at 23:02 | #2

    Dear Roger
    I am currently working on a Viral Change project (with Dr Herrero’s support) for an 800 employee organisation. I am using Viral Change to effect cultural and behavioural change following acquisition and in line with new corporate strategy in this organisation which has a strong silo mentality and is used to a more hierarchical structure. I have worked hard with the CEO and senior team, who have bought in fully to the process (this is vital in successful execution of viral change). If you send me your email, I will be happy to share a case study with you which will bring viral change to life. I firmly believe that viral change would be a highly effective process in the organisation you describe.

    Meanwhile, you can certainly read the Wiki that I have written to find out more:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_Change

    and here is Dr Herrero’s website for your info:
    http://www.viralchange.net/

    If you want to chat, I will be happy to start a dialogue. Please email me at sue@changeworkscom.co.uk with your contact details and I can offer you some guidance. viral change is quite specialist in its approach and needs a good understanding of how to ‘engineer’ the ‘designed informality’. Essentially this is a process that is highly effective, looks simple but requires more skill and expertise to engineer than is initially apparent.

  1. No trackbacks yet.